Most violations are already live
The risky line usually isn't in new content — it's the page that's been up for two years saying a product “treats” something, or “safe for human use,” or listing a dosage. A generic audit hands you a vague score. This one hands you the sentence: it reads each page, scans for prohibited phrasing, and reports every hit with the phrase, the page, and the specific rule — because a finding you can't point at isn't actionable.
What the audit checks
Prohibited claims, with evidence
It scans every page for claim language your industry can't use — cure, treat, dosing, for human use, weight loss — and names the exact phrase and the rule it breaks.
Missing disclaimers
It checks that the disclaimer your industry requires is actually present on each page — and flags the ones without it.
Missing pages
It checks that the structural pages a storefront needs — privacy, terms, shipping, returns — actually exist.
Severity, not noise
Prohibited claims are critical; a missing disclaimer is high; a missing page is medium. You fix what matters first.
Facts, not a number
Every finding is something you can verify by looking at the page. No confidence score to trust — the phrase is there or it isn't.
Fixes you approve
It can draft the fixes: the disclaimer goes on automatically, rewrites and new pages come back for your review. Nothing changes on your live site without your approval.
What it catches — and what it can't
Straight answer: it catches the checkable things — prohibited claim phrasing, missing disclaimers, missing pages — and it's strict because it uses the same rules a compliant build would. It does not judge your strategy, and it is not legal advice. A subtle implied claim it has no phrase for can still slip past it, and your compliance counsel still owns the final call. It dramatically narrows the gap; it doesn't close it for you.
This audit vs. a generic site checker
| Finds prohibited claims | Yes, with the exact phrase | No |
| Maps each to a rule | Yes | No |
| Checks required disclaimers | Per page | No |
| Output | Facts you can verify | A score you trust |
| Can draft the fixes | Yes, for your approval | No |
Questions about ownership
What does it actually flag?
Prohibited claim phrasing (cure, treat, dosing, for human use, weight loss, FDA-approved…), missing required disclaimers, and missing structural pages — each with the page and the rule it maps to.
Does it change my site automatically?
No. It reports findings, and if you ask it to fix them, the disclaimer is applied but rewrites and new pages come back as drafts for your review. Nothing publishes on its own.
Is this legal compliance review?
No. It's an evidence-based guardrail that catches accidental violations in your content — not legal advice, and not a replacement for your counsel.
What industries does it cover?
Peptide/research-chemical (the strictest), supplement, medical, legal, and financial — each with its own prohibited claims and required disclaimer.
See what's already on your site.
An evidence-based audit that finds the claims you can't make — before someone else does.
See how the Business Builder works →